Summary
Effective succession planning goes beyond identifying replacements for critical roles. It requires understanding leadership readiness, using objective data to identify potential, and developing future leaders for increasingly complex responsibilities. These five succession planning best practices help organizations address immediate leadership risks while building a stronger pipeline for the future.
For many talent management and L&D (learning and development) teams, the need for succession planning is clear. Many recognize critical gaps and deficiencies in their current processes or tools. But with tight budgets, fragmented priorities, and business pressures that demand attention now, they’re torn away from anything that implies “long-term.” New approaches fall to the bottom of the list.
But the leadership readiness gap isn’t going away. It’s only becoming more imminent.
DDI's Global Leadership Forecast 2027 reveals just how widespread the concern has become: 88% of HR professionals lack confidence in their leadership pipeline. And organizations are still counting on internal talent to fill critical roles. Earlier DDI research has also found that 75% of organizations prioritize internal promotion over external hiring, yet internal candidates can fill only 49% of critical positions immediately.
This creates a dangerous paradox: Organizations want to promote from within, but there’s a shortage of leaders who are ready now. This challenge is compounded by the fact that many companies lack the structures they need to prepare the next generation of leaders effectively.
Imagine the leaders your organization relies on unexpectedly retiring or stepping away tomorrow for a new opportunity, but with no one ready to fill their roles. It’s a scenario that would make any HR leader sweat. Yet many organizations still hesitate to invest in building succession plans at scale.
Creating a succession strategy used to take years. Today, organizations need something more practical and immediate—a road map that addresses urgent leadership risks now while building a stronger leadership pipeline over time.
Why Succession Planning Strategy Fails Before It Begins
HR and talent leaders are under immense pressure from all sides, balancing multiple (often competing) priorities. With so much urgency focused on immediate business needs, succession planning can feel too complex and too slow to deliver value. The tools, tactics, and processes behind it often require time to take effect. So it gets pushed aside.
But the problem isn’t just time or resources. Succession planning also fails when organizations try to solve everything at once, like building comprehensive plans, mapping every role, or developing every leader simultaneously.
That approach isn’t realistic. Instead, an effective succession planning strategy starts with a series of focused leadership decisions. By breaking the succession management process into smaller, practical steps, you can start strengthening your bench now, not years into the future.
Why Leadership Readiness Is the New Goal of Succession Planning
Succession planning is often misunderstood as replacement planning. But backfilling roles left by departing or retiring leaders is only part of the challenge.
The real goal of a succession strategy is leadership readiness.
That means leaders are prepared to step into new and expanded roles and succeed. They have the skills and experience to lead larger teams, execute strategy, and handle the increased scope and complexity that comes with more strategic roles within the organization.
Organizations need a strong bench, with leaders who can:
- Adapt to an ever-changing landscape.
- Make decisions based on the current context.
- Navigate the organization in new directions.
Without leaders who can step up and deliver results, succession plans are futile. And those capabilities don’t develop on their own.
That’s why the focus of succession must shift from simply "planning" to action by building the tangible processes that define readiness and prepare leaders for what’s next. Succession planning can’t be a thought exercise. It's an active, strategic process to build leadership capability.
DDI's research has tracked persistent challenges with leadership bench strength for more than a decade. Despite growing awareness of the problem, organizations continue to struggle to build a pipeline of leaders ready to step into critical roles.
That matters because a strong bench protects organizational health and business performance. When critical roles open and capable leaders are ready to step in, organizations maintain momentum rather than losing time to gaps or failed transitions.
The data backs this up. Organizations with strong leadership benches are:
- 3.5X more likely to be recognized as most admired companies.
- 2.9X more likely to successfully fill leadership roles internally.
- 2.8X more likely to outperform financially.
So where should you focus first to build a tailored succession plan that works now and reinforces your pipeline for the future?
Five Succession Planning Best Practices to Build a Stronger Leadership Bench
Closing the leadership readiness gap requires more than identifying potential successors. These five succession planning best practices can help organizations turn talent insights into action, strengthen their leadership pipeline, and prepare leaders for future roles.
Best Practice #1: Start with Your Most Critical Leadership Roles
Instead of building a comprehensive program, start where it matters most: roles that have the greatest impact on operations and business performance. This clarifies where your actions will drive immediate results.
1. Identify Critical Roles
The first step is figuring out where leaders have an outsized influence on performance. Ask:
- Which roles drive revenue?
- Who leads major strategy execution?
- Who influences large teams?
- Which positions require specialized experience?
Your succession planning strategy should prioritize these roles. The list might include regional business leaders, product innovation leaders, or transformation leaders. But the red thread is that your organization depends on them.
2. Pinpoint Leadership Gaps
Next, figure out where risk is highest:
- Which critical roles have no ready successor?
- Which leaders are likely to leave or retire soon?
- Which roles are hardest to replace externally?
This step highlights where your succession plans need to focus first.
3. Evaluate Current Bench Strength
Finally, evaluate what your leadership bench strength looks like now:
- Who could step into these roles today?
- Who could be ready with the right support?
- What new capabilities might these roles require as business needs evolve?
This step might feel uncomfortable, but it reveals important information about your leaders' current and future capabilities. Even if the list is short, you’ve made progress.
Start here: It’s okay to start small and scale. Focus on the ten leadership roles most critical to business success. Using the questions above, identify where succession risk is highest. From there, you can take targeted action and expand over time.
Best Practice #2: Replace Guesswork with Objective Leadership Data
In many organizations, talent decisions still come down to opinion. That’s a problem because leaders consistently overestimate readiness.
Part of the issue is failing to distinguish between performance, potential, and readiness. While the lines can blur, they're different benchmarks, and confusing them leads to poor decisions.
One common mistake is relying on 360-degree feedback or performance data from a current role to predict success in a future one. While this data shows how leaders perform today, it doesn’t measure potential or readiness for the next level.
Strong performance in a current role doesn’t guarantee success in a future one. For example, a high-performing salesperson won’t automatically succeed as a sales leader.
Objective leadership assessments are the antidote because they provide both broad and deep insight into leaders’ current skills and capabilities, and how those strengths and gaps may translate to new, future, or more senior roles.
That distinction becomes even more important as leadership requirements change. Organizations need to understand not only whether someone has performed well, but whether they have the potential and capabilities to succeed with greater complexity, ambiguity, and strategic responsibility.
Benefits of Assessment-Driven Succession Planning
Assessment transforms succession planning from an expensive guessing game to evidence-based leadership decisions. When talent management leaders use assessment effectively, they help organizations:
- Reduce promotion risk.
- Identify hidden potential that might have gone overlooked.
- Build a solid foundation for targeted development.
Promotions are 1.6X more likely to succeed when assessments inform leadership selection.
Start here: If you’re not already using assessments in your succession planning strategy, begin with the high-risk roles you identified earlier. Pilot assessments with a small group, measure impact, and scale over time.
Best Practice #3: Spot High-Potential Talent Before Gaps Appear
Many organizations discover leadership gaps too late—after a role becomes vacant. Without early visibility into emerging talent, organizations struggle to fill roles, spread development investments too broadly, and default to reactive leadership decisions.
A strong succession planning strategy creates visibility early, helping leaders understand not only who’s ready now, but who could be ready next.
Once you’ve defined your critical roles, the next step is to identify individuals who could potentially grow into those positions. Search for signals using:
- Structured talent reviews.
- Input from senior leaders.
- Evaluation of current performance and growth trajectory.
- Observations from real leadership experiences, including:
- Leading complex projects.
- Managing cross-functional initiatives.
- Taking on stretch assignments.
This is another area where objective data strengthens decisions. Validated leadership assessments can reveal strengths, uncover motivational fit, clarify development needs, and clarify future readiness. That’s how you move beyond subjective labels like “high potential.”
But identifying high-potential talent is only the beginning. Organizations also need to understand what those individuals will need to develop before they're ready for their next role. Otherwise, succession plans may identify promising leaders without creating a clear path to readiness.
Start here: Make sure your definition of high potential is anchored in the requirements of future leadership roles. Identify the skills, experiences, and capabilities needed for critical roles, then evaluate employees against those success profiles using assessments and talent reviews.
Best Practice #4: Accelerate Readiness with Targeted Development
Even with a good understanding of your leaders and high-potential talent, growth doesn’t happen automatically. Organizations must intentionally develop leaders to prepare them for future roles and support successful transitions.
When done well, development significantly improves promotion outcomes. DDI’s research shows that internal promotions are more successful when leaders:
- Participate in cohort development programs. (3.7X)
- Experience sequential leadership learning. (3.2X)
- Receive frequent manager coaching. (2.6X)
But not all development is equal. One-size-fits-all programs may build baseline skills, but they don’t prepare leaders for what’s next.
Leaders stepping into more complex roles need targeted development that equips them for the challenges ahead. Targeted development accelerates readiness by building the specific capabilities leaders will need to excel at the next level.
And those capabilities need to extend beyond strategy alone. DDI's research on future leadership skills shows that only 28% of organizations invest in both the strategic skills leaders prioritize and the interpersonal capabilities they tend to overlook. Yet organizations investing in all eight capabilities examined are 2.1X more likely to expect a strong leadership bench three years from now.
That's an important distinction for succession planning. Preparing leaders for bigger roles means building both the strategic judgment to navigate complex business challenges and the interpersonal skills to bring people along.
Provide learning experiences in multiple formats:
- Stretch assignments expose learners to new or future responsibilities within a business context and challenges with real stakes.
- Manager or executive coaching helps learners apply new skills with targeted guidance and drive behavior change.
- Leadership programs provide a structured learning journey that helps learners develop new skills with assessment, practice, and peer support.
- Cross-functional experiences broaden the way leaders think about the enterprise and help them build networks across functions.
Start here: Prioritize development that directly reflects leaders’ responsibilities and the business situations they might face in future roles. Give leaders opportunities to:
- Solve real organizational problems.
- Lead strategic initiatives.
- Navigate complex change.
This accelerates leadership capability and lets you see how leaders perform in high-stakes situations based on their target roles. You can use your observations to refine development and succession decisions, alongside assessment data.
Best Practice #5: Make Succession a Leadership Priority
Of course, none of this work matters in the long term if succession plans fizzle out. Sustaining progress requires making leadership development a shared organizational priority, not just an HR initiative. Here’s what stable succession plans share:
Visible Executive Sponsorship
Executive support can make or break succession strategies. Bring executives into the process and make it visible to reinforce the importance of leadership bench strength to the business. Ask them to:
- Participate in talent discussions and succession reviews.
- Reinforce the importance of developing internal leaders.
- Treat leadership development as a business priority tied to future performance.
Intentional Stakeholder Alignment
Succession planning gains traction when leaders share a clear understanding of leadership priorities and talent gaps—and actively engage in the process.
HR and talent leaders enable this alignment, but leaders across the business must apply it. That’s how succession management becomes part of business strategy.
Defined Success Metrics
Track a focused set of leadership pipeline indicators to monitor your bench's health. For example:
- Number of successors for critical roles
- Internal promotion rates
- Progress on accelerated development plans or goals
- Time required to fill key leadership positions
- Readiness levels for successors identified for critical roles
Clear Accountability and Follow-Through
Effective succession strategies require clear ownership. HR and L&D design the development strategy and provide the tools, but managers are also accountable for developing their people.
They play a key role by helping emerging leaders apply new skills, tackle meaningful stretch experiences, and navigate challenges and transitions.
Define how you’ll review progress and who is responsible at each stage. Regularly revisit readiness assessments and development plans as the needs of critical roles evolve, ensuring potential successors continue building the capabilities they'll need to succeed.
Robust Communication
Clear and transparent communication builds trust and reinforces leadership growth as a priority. Make sure employees understand:
- How leaders are identified and developed.
- What it takes to grow into leadership roles.
- Why development matters to the organization’s future.
Start here: Find your stakeholder champions—the leaders who already root for you—and lean in by partnering with them early. Their influence can amplify your efforts and expand buy-in across the organization.
Start Where It Matters Most
Succession planning doesn’t need to start with a comprehensive strategy or massive transformation. Many organizations don’t have the time, budget, or capacity to solve it all at once.
What you can do is take meaningful steps to reduce leadership risk, starting now. Begin with these succession planning best practices:
- Identify the roles that would create the greatest risk if left unfilled.
- Gain visibility into who could step into these roles today.
- Prioritize a small group of future leaders to invest in.
- Accelerate their development toward those roles.
- Make succession a shared leadership priority, with clear accountability for developing future leaders and tracking their readiness.
And as leadership demands continue to change, succession planning can't stop at identifying who might be next. It needs to build confidence that those leaders will be capable of succeeding when their time comes.
Have a Question?
Frequently Asked Questions About Succession Planning Best Practices
-
What are the most effective succession planning best practices?
The most effective succession planning best practices focus on quickly reducing urgent leadership risk. Start by identifying critical roles, using objective data to assess readiness, identifying high-potential talent early, and investing in targeted development. Then sustain progress by making succession a shared leadership priority beyond HR.
-
What should a strong succession planning strategy include?
A strong succession planning strategy prioritizes true leadership readiness over replacement planning. It should define key roles, evaluate leadership potential and readiness through assessment, and provide development opportunities that reflect future capability needs.
-
What is the typical succession management process?
A typical succession management process moves from clarity to action. First, organizations should pinpoint the roles that carry the most business risk, then assess who is ready now and where gaps exist. Then invest in potential leaders with development that builds readiness for those critical roles.
-
How can organizations improve leadership bench strength?
Organizations improve leadership bench strength by focusing on readiness, not just performance. That means identifying who can step into future leadership roles, not just who excels today. Prioritize development tied to future responsibilities, give leaders stretch opportunities, and provide ongoing feedback to build their readiness.
-
What's the difference between succession planning and replacement planning?
Replacement planning focuses on identifying someone who can fill a role when it becomes vacant. Succession planning takes a broader approach by evaluating leadership potential, identifying readiness gaps, and developing people for future responsibilities. The goal is to build a pipeline of capable leaders, not simply a list of replacements.